Gamingforce Interactive Forums
28881 28808

Go Back   Gamingforce Interactive Forums > Gamingforce Support > Board Support
Maximum signature dimensions Maximum signature dimensions
Register FAQ GFWiki Members List Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums.
GFF is a hellhole full of elitists who chat about everything EXCEPT games. We have a team of dedicated moderators who will ban your ass on the slightest provocation, constant member-organized activities that you are not allowed to participate in, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system where you can post entries that will be completely ignored. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Although membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message) we do not recommend that you sign up, because you will get kicked in the nuts repeatedly.


Maximum signature dimensions
Reply
Page 8 of 8 « First < 67 8
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
売れんかいな


Member 90

Level 33.51

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 11:11 AM #176 (permalink) of 193
Originally Posted by Tube
A lot of people care about the signature checker, myself included. It is highly retarded.
Quote for truth.

And for good measure:
Originally Posted by Tube
A lot of people care about the signature checker, myself included. It is highly retarded.

LET'S GOOOOOOOO~
I'LL BRING THE LAW OF NATURE TO YOU
GALLANTRY


Member 80

Level 43.75

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 03:30 PM Local time: May 30, 2006, 03:30 PM #177 (permalink) of 193
Just adding to the "Hey can you fucking nix it already" crowd.

Seriously, it can't be that difficult to remove, or at the very least, alter to reflect the new sig rules.
Banned


Member 54

Level 45.73

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 08:06 PM Local time: May 31, 2006, 02:06 PM #178 (permalink) of 193
I'd like to know whether or not the sig limit is still a maximum of 50k, because Skills has a 73kb sig.
For hate's sake I spit my last diss at thee


Member 1512

Level 40.70

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 08:14 PM #179 (permalink) of 193
Originally Posted by Elixir
And the point of bumping a sticky is? =[

I don't think anyone cares anymore about the signature checker or dimensions.
Elixir. Buddy. You just responded to a month-old post to tell Acer his concerns are outdated.

Think about that.


IN OTHER NEWS: Still no justice for avatar size queens
売れんかいな


Member 90

Level 33.51

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 08:37 PM #180 (permalink) of 193
Originally Posted by Elixir
I'd like to know whether or not the sig limit is still a maximum of 50k, because Skills has a 73kb sig.
It depends on what you follow.

I say it's 75k. Some will say 50k.

LET'S GOOOOOOOO~
I'LL BRING THE LAW OF NATURE TO YOU
Super Moderator


Member 7

Level 39.45

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 08:57 PM Local time: May 30, 2006, 06:57 PM #181 (permalink) of 193
The opening post in the thread says 50kb.

I also like how pang totally missed the timestamp on Elixir's post while making fun of him for replying to an old post.
GALLANTRY


Member 80

Level 43.75

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 09:00 PM Local time: May 30, 2006, 09:00 PM #182 (permalink) of 193
The consensus reached in this thread on the previous pages, if you bothered to read it Lix, is that the new limit is 75k.

Since that conclusion was reached, I've had at least 3 sigs that are over 50k in size, as have plenty of others. It's not hard to conclude based on this that the new limit is 75k.

I'm just complaining because the damn checker hasn't been updated with this yet.

Edit: RR, reading over the last few pages leads me to believe that the new upperbound is 75. Is this or isn't this true? Now I don't even know.
Super Moderator


Member 7

Level 39.45

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 09:04 PM Local time: May 30, 2006, 07:04 PM #183 (permalink) of 193
It's not true, as far as I remember it was just people wishing the limit had been increased so that's what they all decided to assume.

I haven't been killing sigs recently because for some reason firefox doesn't report image sizes properly when I look at their properties. =/
GALLANTRY


Member 80

Level 43.75

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 10:03 PM Local time: May 30, 2006, 10:03 PM #184 (permalink) of 193
Miles said 75k was fine over the phone.

So it's back.
Super Moderator


Member 7

Level 39.45

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2006, 10:04 PM Local time: May 30, 2006, 08:04 PM #185 (permalink) of 193
(For now...)

*dramatic chord*
persona~!


Member 1131

Level 40.54

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2006, 02:10 PM Local time: Jun 15, 2006, 02:10 AM #186 (permalink) of 193
I was modded today. So it's fine to put all the text in spoiler tag, right?
Free VGM Mp3 Download~

Originally Posted by Papa Haydn
You all think you got good deals, huh? Ha! You frugal and observant shoppers have more to learn.

None of that approaches this:
*censored for sake of signature size*
The Mr. Methane CD, purchased over ebay for .01¢. Yeah, free shipping. This guy performs all sorts of neat stuff, including the doot doot, doot doot from the Blue Danube.

Allow me to share a track from this CD. Here ya go.
Originally Posted by Forsety
I think he should have paid you .01¢ instead.
KALEB●G


Member 13

Level 39.09

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 14, 2006, 06:12 PM #187 (permalink) of 193
That looks fine to me now. It was just incredibly long before.

The rules aren't as clear as they should be, but it means that all images and text combined should be no larger than 300px high. The line about not stretching the postbit is what really matters here.

Anyway, since font tags can be used to fit more text in with smaller sizes, I think it should be the same with spoiler tags.
On the edge of the city


Member 225

Level 34.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2006, 01:48 PM #188 (permalink) of 193
there's a lot of sig recently that doesn't follow the sig rules(GoW and Secret of Mana) and apparently it doesn't seem to bother anyone (well anyone but me)

I doN,t really car that they are bigger or are over the kb limit, it's just that I know if me I would have done it, it would have probably been moded...

so all I'm saying is if you want to make some signature rules, at least mods should apply them for everyone...
Unavailable


Member 5

Level 42.78

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 20, 2006, 02:00 PM Local time: Nov 21, 2006, 04:00 AM #189 (permalink) of 193
They sought special permission, and it was granted. Next.
Flying Toaster


Member 16855

Level 4.68

Dec 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Dec 12, 2006, 05:39 PM Local time: Dec 13, 2006, 12:39 AM #190 (permalink) of 193
Hey, just wanted to ask, is this sig alright? I know it's technically three images, but between them they make up far less than a normal sig would. Just wanted to check and be sure. I respect the rules, I do.
"Show...a little more respect...for faerie tales..."
Last edited by Razikain : Dec 12, 2006 at 05:42 PM.
Super Moderator


Member 7

Level 39.45

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Dec 12, 2006, 06:59 PM Local time: Dec 12, 2006, 05:59 PM #191 (permalink) of 193
I think it should be fine.
Ailes Grises


Member 16

Level 41.33

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2006, 06:07 AM Local time: Dec 13, 2006, 03:07 PM #192 (permalink) of 193
Yeah, looks alright to me.

The three images are consistent and match, the original two image limit was mostly set because people kept using a dozens of smilies and numerous random images of varying sizes and quality in their sig, when a single image would look much nicer.

?
You have a responsibility to the public discourse, and you fail miserably.


Member 27

Level 52.43

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2006, 06:22 AM Local time: Dec 13, 2006, 06:22 AM #193 (permalink) of 193
Originally Posted by Inhert
there's a lot of sig recently that doesn't follow the sig rules(GoW and Secret of Mana) and apparently it doesn't seem to bother anyone (well anyone but me)

I doN,t really car that they are bigger or are over the kb limit, it's just that I know if me I would have done it, it would have probably been moded...

so all I'm saying is if you want to make some signature rules, at least mods should apply them for everyone...
Originally Posted by BigBlah
They sought special permission, and it was granted. Next.
Hah! Blah went all Quentin Tarantino on us there for a second. "Because you're a fucking chode, that's why. Next."

Here is what I believe is the paradigm that would be effective and what I would love to see, and you're going to laugh because Fox News is my model. What Fox has done is they've got a guy, Roger Ailes, who's passionate and has created a model for a 24-hour news station that makes money based on a point of view... Using Fox's model, find someone with the passion and the huevos to just lay it on the line - not in a partisan way, not in the pursuit of political power and political gain, but in the pursuit of credibility. In the pursuit of being a judge, an arbiter, and earning the trust of the audience over time as an oversight to the shenanigans of the political world.
Reply
Page 8 of 8 « First < 67 8


Thread Tools

Gamingforce Interactive Forums > Gaming