The Issue with Attachments

Some of you may have seen the thread from SB. In case you ignored it or weren't there, here it is again. My idea is to have all of the various attachments on Concerthall (sheetmusic, etc) hosted offline, so as there isn't as much stress on the admins and the server. Miles even made a journal entry about the problem and there are plenty of people here that don't take too kindly to the problem, so to speak.

Also, there needs to be more intelligent discussion in here. The majority of people come here, request something, get it, and never participate in discussion. Or, they come here, request something, request it again, whine about not getting it yet, request another upload site, etc. Sure, downloading sheetmusic or recordings is good, but what about discussing what you're getting? Our community is deteriorating because of this. The other sections have lots and lots of discussion. But why not this one? Thoughts?

Also, remember that the #concerthall IRC channel is a great place for music discussion.

Additional Spam:
55 views and no thoughts? The lack of discussion in this thread highlights one of my points exactly.

The fact that this thread has been ignored until now speaks volumes. Those that frequent the Musician's Library are clearly not interested in change. Speak your mind if you object, otherwise change will be implemented without your consent and surely you'll bitch to no end then.

I, for one, feel that attachments should be disabled and all file-hosting done somewhere else. A running index of what has been posted can be made and maintained and requests to re-upload can be posted. Similarly, for those of you that are as adamant and hardcore about this as you seem to be, why not take your own damned money and pay for your own server so that you can leech and allow leeching as much as you want? Please, this shit isn't cheap and I'm frankly surprised that it's gone on as long as it has without complaining.

Really, though, when TWO threads greatly contribute to a delay in uploading information, that says something.

Be a little more considerate, at least.

Also, where are our mods and why isn't this thread marked important and stickied?

Also, look at the amount of dead threads in the Listening Room, and even Musician's Library. The whole Listening Room is dead, actually. When the "Identify the Composer" thread was active, and maybe some of the others, it was better. But now it seems that mindless leeching has taken over. There needs to be some serious attention to this situation before Concerthall gets overrun even more with leechers and a lack of discussion.

hey maybe they thought they could get some sheet music, this is a serious issue, but it won't be easy to solve either... I mean concerthall has had its ups and downs but it still was mainly about exchange so it's about time something happens to make the situation better, but to be honest Concerthall is already overrun by leechers I rarely post any requests or anything different since I don't share interests with the majority of the userbase of this forum, or better yet none.

As much as I hate to say this, concerthall is the reason I ended up here, at some point I was one mindless leech that lurked for quite a long time and I still practically do that(lurking, leeching not as much) but solving the attachment issue is the best way I can think of making things better.

I see no reason why these kids can't learn to use an FTP like the rest of us did.

Personally I think we'd do well to shift attachments to another location or FTP since it's unfair to expect the rest of GFF to accept our space requirements when most of us (myself included) don't contribute anywhere else on the site.

I also think the rather holier-than-thou stance adopted by many of those pressing the issue might be putting some people off. Plenty of people here only want to be active in the sheet music and recordings threads, and the fact is the moderating team, especially Face, have given their reasons (numerous times) for not wanting to force a change.

If people without any power here want to try to inspire change, that's all well and good, but I rather feel "Come on this is IMPORTANT why aren't you talking about this you morons?" style threads aren't going to get much done.

Okay, I'm moving this to Board Support where more people will see it and leaving a redirect just in case for more Concert Hall goers to join in this discussion.

The condition of my hands won't allow me to make any long posts right now, but I have to say this is a bothersome and somewhat complex issue. It's not like I haven't looked into it and tried to solve it before, but the results never met my expectations.

Just don't forget there's two sides to this argument. Yes, such an amount of mindless leeching on a forum striving for quality discussion is bothersome. Yes, few leechers actually show any gratitude or even courtesy towards the favour that GFF is doing them, and some are just outright disrespectful (cf. the Tsobanian incident during the downtime).

Yet, on the other hand, the little VGM-centered sheet music sharing community that CH used to be would probably never have expanded this much were it not for our "acceptance" of leeching and the availability of attachment space. During the time it grew with little regulation, CH attracted countless leechers, but also dozens and dozens of valid contributors, whose gathering made the appearance of some pretty rare and interesting stuff possible.

I've always thought of leeching as a necessary evil. If for 100 leechers we get one boonsen or one Lousy, then by all means it is worth it.

I've also come to accept that not everybody is actually interested in discussing anything, and that trying to force people into it would yield poor results. So long as people contribute to the community, both words and files are fine. Recently my reasoning has been that if we want the discussion side of CH to develop, it ought to be carried forward by a few core members (Dull, you two, Wafer et al.), hopefully with the random passer-by joining up now and then. I believe many people have the potential to be interested but just stop at the "whatever, this place looks dead" first impression. Better prove them otherwise, especially now that GFF is back in business for good.

As for the attachments themselves, I don't think they'd actually be that much of a problem were it not for the indifference or lack of courtesy towards GFF shown by many concerthallers. I'd rather work on the latter part than remove the attachments altogether.

Damn, this came out longer than I intended.

And how would any of those things change if files were simply hosted off-site, Face?

Originally Posted by ♪^___^♪

As for the attachments themselves, I don't think they'd actually be that much of a problem were it not for the indifference or lack of courtesy towards GFF shown by many concerthallers. I'd rather work on the latter part than remove the attachments altogether.

Did you happen to see Miles' journal entry? If he has a problem with it, clearly it is an important problem. I think both the indifference and lack of courtesy and the problem with the large attachments both need to be worked on. We're using up like 25GB! How much do you think the other parts of GFF are using up? Nowhere near as much. I don't think it's fair, even if there is no issue with space. And besides, the recordings are hosted off line. Why not the sheetmusic? People download both things about equally, and no one has complained about the recordings being hosted off line.

The thing is, after the last two or three crashes, I asked the administration each time about the sheet music attachments, suggesting they be hosted off-site if space was an issue. And, each time, I was told it wasn't, that they could be kept on-site. And suddenly this becomes a huge problem and we're under fire. Make up your minds, guys.

As for me, eh, I don't care either way, since I was about to resign from moderation as soon as GFF was restored anyway. So I guess I'll let you guys have fun with this mess.

I've left a 10 day announcement throughout Concert Hall and Other Requests in light of the redirect getting bumped off the planet.

Well, we know that Miles, the site owner, who pays for the server out of pocket, is unhappy with the amount of bandwidth being taken up by sheet music. In all other parts of the forums, attachments are managed by FTPs and sites devoted to providing free bandwidth for file transfers.

When Miles addresses his concerns about the amount of bandwidth he has to pay for, people in here start accusing him of being 'disrespectful' and get all butthurt. This place isn't free. He has a right to be annoyed.

I think the biggest problem GFF at large has with the concerthall is how it is its own separate little community within a community, i.e. there is no link between the Concerthall and greater GFF aside from the shared webspace. They really feel that the concerthall forum should really have its own website and server, and be run by a separate owner and staff. In fact, when the forums were still paid for by bobo, Minion had tried to sever the concerthall from GFF at large and turn it into a unique community free of the larger boards.

When people here are using a large percentage of the communities resources and they don't invest any money, it can really create a bad vibe. You know, people who aren't contributing to the community in any way, are the biggest bitches when their resources are no longer available. Can you understand the frustration here? I mean I try to defend the concerthall community as necessary, but it becomes increasingly difficult in light of this sort of behavior.

The obvious solutions are 1) All of you cheap bastards donate money to help pay for the server costs (it costs $40 just for one urtext, so that shouldn't be such a big deal 2) Find ways to host the sheet music offsite and be smart enough to figure out how to access FTPs. Geez louise, it isn't THAT hard to do. 3) Split off and start a separate community. You'll have to pony up cash but this might be a great arrangement.

thoughts.

Originally Posted by AcerBandit

I've left a 10 day announcement throughout Concert Hall and Other Requests in light of the redirect getting bumped off the planet.

Thanks for that. People there need to see it and God knows how many threads would have bumped it off and this thread would be even more ignored than it already is.

Originally Posted by ♪^___^♪

The thing is, after the last two or three crashes, I asked the administration each time about the sheet music attachments, suggesting they be hosted off-site if space was an issue. And, each time, I was told it wasn't, that they could be kept on-site. And suddenly this becomes a huge problem and we're under fire. Make up your minds, guys.

Well, the library of attachments has grown exponentially since the last few crashes occurred. There have been many contributors, many of them who have posted tons and tons and tons just by themselves. I remember when I first came to GFF, the sheet music section was nowhere as large as it is today. I could see how it wasn't a problem then. But now I think it is getting out of hand and some change needs to occur.

I personally don't care if the concert hall people want to leech all day long. That's fine with me. That's the culture of this part of the boards. But I can't see why it would be so hard to FTP this stuff.

Maybe I'm not remembering this correctly, but wasn't there once an announcement about not posting anything that hadn't been specifically requested? Of course sometimes the only way to find new music to play/listen to is to get something you didn't even know existed, but I found that worked well enough when the sheet music community was smaller and there weren't so many attachments all over the place.

There's been a spate recently of people who contribute a LOT - but I mean megabyte after megabyte of unrequested sheet music, musicology texts, and even some things that are pretty worthless (in most circumstances) as posted - violin sonata parts without the piano accompaniment, for example.

While the flood of stuff has been good for those of us in the Concert Hall looking for anything new, the trade-off has been that it all takes up space, and we've hit the sharp edge of that now.

Additionally, Face, if you're still planning on resigning your moderator status, I'm sorry to hear it and I'd like to say thank you for the patience and fairness you've shown in dealing with all the Concert Hall problems.

Originally Posted by ♪^___^♪

The thing is, after the last two or three crashes, I asked the administration each time about the sheet music attachments, suggesting they be hosted off-site if space was an issue. And, each time, I was told it wasn't, that they could be kept on-site. And suddenly this becomes a huge problem and we're under fire. Make up your minds, guys.

So their opinion changing between the last crash and this one constitutes not being able to make up your mind? Perhaps if you asked Miles more than once a year it might not seem all that sudden.

To be honest, unless Miles comes out and basically says "There is too much of this shit, PLEASE move it off site", I could really care less since I don't go to Concert Hall. On the other hand, if you guys like these forums so much, wouldn't it make sense to try to make the experience better by moving at least SOME of it offsite?

I agree with Deni and Rat - most of the FTP community knows beforehand that if you want something you post it to sendspace or browse an FTP. Can you imagine what kind of bandwidth this place would accumulate if the MyStuff posters posted their stuff as attachments?

It's not hard to use an FTP server at all whether you're hosting or browsing. If everyone else can do this with no problem, concert hall should be able to do the same if only for the sake of keeping the boards alive and being a bit more lax for the owners of the site so everyone has the opportunity to post and share.