|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | GFWiki | Members List | Donate | Arcade | ChocoJournal | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
That's not to say I endorse SS's facetious statement. ^_^ |
|
|
Slavery. It still exists today in many countries and its variants are as wide and the human imagination.
With holocust, the people are dead, no longer to be tortured & abused. Should the act be carried on long enough the victims are exhausted or the source of the acts is snuffed out by those who fear its spread. Slavery on the other hand is tolerated & met with apathy because people profit from it. Its many forms are difficult to bring under one idea and thus is hard to pin down unlike straight up death. |
I can only assume you don't lay the blame where it belongs because you're too busy with all the cocks that need to be sucked. ![]() |
Just sayin' PS. Why are all non-religious people so anti-religion? It can't just be "oh they believe in god, whatever" Its, "Why are people so stupid religion causes war, cancer, and erectile disfunction~" Its like they are terrified of the though of someone thinking differently then them. I'm not saying Arainach is doing that, but I see it all the time elsewhere. ![]()
Last edited by janus zeal : Aug 15, 2007 at 03:54 PM.
Reason: grammar. ;_;
|
|
|
On the original topic, I personally don't think there is a point in comparing between the significance of different atrocities, in some sense it is rather a relative issue depending on your views. However, whatever your political objective or social issue is that you care about, its important for you to bring attention to those issues or injustices. Though I don't think it brings the issue into proper perspective if you can only see an issue in the light of other atrocities.
♪♡
|
Some religious people are great individuals. But without exception I haven't found a religion (except Quakerism and Buddhism) that isn't an intrusive crock of shit. |
|
I'm going to have to go with slavery. It's true that victims of both travesties were dehumanized, but I would wager that more people were killed as part of the Holocaust than as part of slavery. For one, the slaveowners would have no benefit from killing their source of labor. Likewise, isn't death a release from the physical torture? Morbid and macabre as that may sound, I would much rather die than be unable to exercise free will. =/
|
![]() |
|
|
On the subject of religion: while I don't believe that it has killed a vast number of people on its own, I DO agree with the idea that it has been used to justify the actions of those in power at the time said violence occurred.
For example, religious truth was the moral pillar that turned the Crusades from mere warmongering to a noble endeavor. The Roman Catholic Church pretty much ruled the world long ago, and their inherent position as a religious organization allowed others to turn a blind eye to any atrocities being committed under their noses. |
Oh, hell, just drop "unchallenged", then. It just sounds more evil with it in there, that's all. |
|
The Holocaust lead to more malicious torture and pain, I think, as a lot of what was done to the Jews was done just because the German's didn't like them, and a lot of what was done to the slaves was to keep them in line. There was also not as much deliberate killing proportionally, because slaves had a purpose and Jews were apparently just a problem.
That said, in both situations an entire people were deemed as "sub human" and treated worse than men usually treat their animals. There's really no way to compare, they both sucked. Also, wow some people are really anti Christian. I'm personally agnostic and don't care either way, and I don't know that much about Christianity's history, but I can say that there's been a hell of a lot of killing in Asia that had pretty much nothing to do with religion. In fact, by sheer number of deaths alone, the Holocaust pales to the Great Leap Forward and then the Cultural Revolution in China when the CCP came to power, and religion practically didn't exist any more at that time. Hell Japan has attacked Korea out of sheer boredom before. Disagreements over religion has caused a great deal of death, but there are parts of the world where the fighting between religious factions wasn't nearly as bad, and we didn't need any of that to kill people. I personally think religion just serves as a mask for some people's greed; if they weren't religious they'd probably be assholes anyway, but since they are it provides a handy excuse for them to not feel like assholes.
Last edited by Aurora : Aug 18, 2007 at 01:26 AM.
|
|
In a way the Holocaust, religion and slavery all interlink for one simple reason, they all involved man having intolerance to views that didn't mirror their own. So for that reason they regarded all other opinions as false and/or worthless without even really learning about them, queue slavery for the less well off people, brainwashing and of course the biggest lol stupid excuse to kill ever 'holy wars'.
I'm not saying religion is bad but it's like anything else made by man easily corrupted. Getting back to the question though the Holocaust wins for being the biggest single event in history, but slavery gets the longest track run award because that shit will probably never stop. |
![]() |