|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | GFWiki | Members List | Donate | Arcade | ChocoJournal | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
Moment of Silence
I am seventeen years old, and I go to school in Illinois.
There is a new law that says every school in Illinoying has to take a moment of silence every day after the pledge of allegence. Absolutly rediculous,
What really annoyed me was when our principal made the announcement yesterday that we were going to observe a moment of silence, he made no mention that it was a law, nor did he give any reason why were taking a moment of silence. It annoyed me becuase, not only do I personally think that it is unconstatutional but kids dont have any idea what they are doing. You could almost look at it like (agian, at least in my schools case) like they are tricking us. Arent you not supposed to have religoun in public schools?
Last edited by Token : Oct 18, 2007 at 11:14 AM.
|
|
Well, while controversial, it's not unconstitutional because a moment of silence doesn't promote or endorse religion in anyway. As they said -- you don't have to pray, you can simply use that time to do whatever you want, albeit silently.
The act of legislating a moment of silence, in my interpretation of the 1st Amendment, isn't a violation. |
|
How about they instead audit school districts to track where all the millions spent on education are going and what they're being spent on instead of passing this symbolic nonsense?
The alleged purpose of antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market. Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy, by special privileges which closed the entry of competitors in a given field, by legislative action. ~Ayn Rand
|
|
But it is only for a couple of seconds. Its not time to do anything but pray.
And I forgot to put where I got it. Ill. Lawmakers Override Veto; Schools Required to Start with Moment of Silence | Christianpost.com |
|
Best part of the article.
|
|
On the list of things that our legislatures waste their time on, this is at the bottom regarding things we should actually give a crap about.
|
RUETERS - STUDENT TURNS HIMSELF IN FOR CINSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER A student who had meticulously planned an attack on his schoolmates turned himself to authorities this past weekened, citing the new mandatory 'moment of silence' in his school as the driving force behind his change of heart. "Ever since we got those few seconds on a daily basis, I've juxt been talking myself out of it. You know, in three second conversations." |
|
|
We're talking about high school students. I don't think most of them have the maturity to use a few seconds of silence. Then again, when everyone around is ostentatiously taking a few seconds of silence, it's hard to do anything but feel self-conscious about what you should be thinking about.
The intent is noble and all, but announcing that everyone will now reflect, and then watching a clock...I don't see that as effective in the least. Also, how will they enforce this? It seems to me that by virtue of the legislature making this mandatory, it creates an additional liability for the school without providing anything in return!
Last edited by Radez29 : Oct 16, 2007 at 08:16 PM.
|
|
This is a flashback moment.....
My grade school tried implementing this almost 30 years ago. Ours was a minute. Time that for yourselves and see how long it is. The students got rid of it by pointing out that the best times for the moment of silence was during the time you're getting ready to leave the house or walking to school. Not when you were already at school. You can listen to the birds chirp, the leaves rustle, the rain fall, and the snow land (you can, really), when you're walking to school. And, yes, I walked to school from kindergarten all the way through Senior year in High School. And I did a lot of thinking before I met up with friends. But, if the day is hectic and you need a moment to "collect your thoughts," then fine. But, it should be on a personal, needed level. Not when you're being told to. |
My friend did not know till I showed her this thread. She said herself that she felt awkward about the whole thing becuase she did not know what it was for. She said its cool for the people who want to pray. But was is the point of dedicating 30 seconds of your day to silence. I still dont think that it is enough time to do anything constructive. |
While i'll agree that a moment of silence every morning before school starts seems a little overboard, i don't really think it's a big deal. There's alot to be offered by silence, as Leknaat already pointed out. Why not take that time to just enjoy existance. No one's telling you that you have to pray.
Last edited by Helloween : Oct 17, 2007 at 11:59 PM.
|
|
My school is telling me that I have to sit here and do nothing for a couple seconds. I SIMPLY WILL NOT ALLOW THIS. How DARE they make a law that for a couple of seconds, while at school, I sit in silence; I might accidentally pray during this time of silence. That is unacceptable.
Did someone call my name?
|
|
What are you complaining about? Sounds like less time you have to do work in!
"Being a negative twat" Not at all "supporting a counter point in the political palace." Cheers for banning me so I couldn't double check Frank's phone number, we had a great time not catching up in North America. Life has been off the hook, thanks for asking!
|
|
I remember feeling cheated by the government when I first started working. See, I wasn't given paid lunches. Do to some law or other, it was also mandatory for me to take a break of at least a half hour for lunch. The end result of this is that I had to stay at the office a half hour longer to still work 40 hours. 2.5 hours out of my day, that I really didn't want, because a legislature decided it knew best how to manage my time.
I lump this in with that. To a lesser degree, yeah, but I still resent the fact that lawmakers are parsing out my day. |
|
Yeah, I hated that too. A lot of times I'd be doing something I could work on equally well while munching down lunch. One place I was at let you work for 8 hours straight if you work through lunch, then take your 30 minute break at the end of the day (worked great for those of us that didn't have to punch time cards).
|
|
Shit, they've been doing that in all the schools here in delaware since the day after 9/11. Nothing new. I delt with it throughout high school. The way I see it it's 10 seconds of your day you don't have do bullshit schoolwork or make conversation with goony classmates.
|
|
|