|
||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | GFWiki | Members List | Donate | Arcade | ChocoJournal | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums. |
|
GFF is a hellhole full of elitists who chat about everything EXCEPT games. We have a team of dedicated moderators who will ban your ass on the slightest provocation, constant member-organized activities that you are not allowed to participate in, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system where you can post entries that will be completely ignored. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Although membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message) we do not recommend that you sign up, because you will get kicked in the nuts repeatedly.
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
Enter the conservative...
I'm actually finding it tough to object on anything other than morals. I just don't want to live in a place that condones that type of industry. On the other hand, nobody seems to be shoving the stripper way of life down the throats of young girls. Although it's a dramatic leap, widespread legalization of prostitution hopefully wouldn't permeate society anymore than gentlemen clubs do. I've heard that places with legalized prostitution like Denmark have very impressive stats with regards to STDs, teen pregnancy, and even higher average age of virgins. Better than in comparison with countries that have outlawed it. (can anyone confirm this?) But I'm still against it. Nyeah nyeah! Whether or not anyone shares my morals or not, I would still push to keep prostitution illegal. Hmm, let's get rid of the strip clubs while we're at it too. MWA HA HA! I honestly feel we'd be better off without those types of things. The world I'm imagining probably isn't as fun, but overall it would be happier one. Hrm, better qualify that last sentence by saying, "...at least in my opinion." But what's the point? 1. Looks like most of you disagree with me. (D'oh!) 2. The other 49 states are very unlikely to amend their laws. (Hooray!) And 3., prostitutes are still going to work, legal or not, throughout the U.S. (Waah!) |
|
Oh man. Can you imagine the recruiting pamphlets in high school for the sex ranches? Kind of like how McDonald's has those advertisements for how they make such an awesome career. I'm sure a ton of girls who've just hit 18 would be up for doing it part time.
|
|
Why is prostitution illegal in the first place? I mean it's their own choice if they wanna sell their bodies for a price. I'm totally against the creation of huge sex ranches though and people running a business with it. The money should go to the actual individuals that have to do this shit.
But I really have no idea how legalized prostitution would affect our society good or bad. So I can't fully support it but it's not like I'm yearning for it nor is it of any interest at all for me so I don't really care what happens with it anyways. ![]() |
|
A regulated market is not necessarily going to be any safer. Look at all the toxic shit the US imported from China. It wasn't until recently that regulators and safety inspectors in the US 'caught on'.
It would encourage more street walkers. Employees will want a bigger cut that not being certified by the government would bring. It's not a problem in European countries because they're welfare states and they don't have hard ons for taxing vice. Any more then any other good or service. I see it being a problem in the 'States. No Republican would go out against support for increasing taxes on vice....... at least not publicly. -_^ If you were to run a brothel, with all the vice taxes and government mandated safety programs for your employees it will be expensive for everyone involved. Not to mention the normal payroll/income taxes on top of it. Making it a lot less lucrative then if it was illegal... or legalized but not regulated. I don't see any benefit socially in vice taxes in this case either, because the government would spent all of it (or more) on regulation and enforcement. Or issues of financial liability that would result. "WHAT?! I GOT A STI FROM A GOVERNMENT REGULATED BROTHEL?!" That's all. I'm pretty much out of ideas.
On the other hand if the government gets away with taxing bodily functions then the sky is the limit. It won't be long before we see fart taxes to combat global warming.... uhh too late? ![]()
I don't just want to give anybody, especially not some biotech corp. any more leeway into messing with my man essence. (or DNA) I'm not comfortable with how many legal rights and patents they have already. There's too many unintended consequences that could result if sex were thrown into the public domain.
Care to elaborate?
|
|
You do all realise Watts is trolling you, right? No one actually believes this sort of idiocy. Messing with man essence? He's doing Dr. Strangelove. He knows as well as anyone that the only real objection to this concept is the moral one. Holland has much lower STD rates than the US, lower sex crime rate, etc. It's all there for anyone who takes the time to look at the statistics. They can regulate porn stars for disease, they can regulate prostitutes very, very easily. And patenting sex? Come on, that idea is so fucking infantile it can't be anything but baiting. This is why he got the joke nom for best debater. I mean, harder to regulate moving people with rides and amusements? They call that a circus. And they do it all the time. Why are we even giving him the time of day? Either he's trolling or he's so stupid he isn't worth it.
![]() And though we are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are--- One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. |
On a more related note, if Prostitution was legal, I'd imagine it would cost strip clubs alot of customers since they could go pay to have sex rather then pay to watch someone dance naked. |
|
As it stands now, you have tons of girls being forced into prostitution through rather illicit means. They are forced into heroine addictions, or beat up and such. Why do they need to be forced? My line of thinking is that the only thing stopping half those 'forced prostitutes' is the fact that it's illegal. It's like one of my friends. He'd be perfectly willing to do certain drugs if it weren't for the fact that they were illegal. So if you legalize prostitution, pimps wouldn't need to force them to do it, and in turn you'd have alot less poorly treated prostitutes. That seems like a benefit of legalized prostitution.
Legalizing it would also mean that the women could actually make a career out of it. With it being legal, they would for sure get more customers. They would be taxed for the income I assume, but for things like applying for an apartment, or possibly getting another job and stuff, they can say 'oh I make this much a year' or something like that. I guess they'd have something to put on their resume. 'Customer Service Experience'. Despite my moral objections, I can see a lot of positive outcomes to legalizing prostitution. |
|
I think it's a good thing that prostitution is legal here (in Germany), within limitations (e.g. no pimps, the necessity of being registered, etc.). While it is not a profession I would choose, I see no reason why others should not be allowed to choose it, as it is not hurting anyone. Why should we not be able to decide over our own bodies?
On the contrary, a legal, registered form of prostitution reduces the risks that go with it, and limits the demand for an importation and abuse of illegal immigrants (although it is still happening here, sadly). |
There are a lot of things that happen in this country which I (and many others) don't like, and don't feel like putting up with. But we do. (creationism, for one)
The problem here is that the Americans regard sex as this awful, dirty, disgusting act.
It's a child's argument.
You see, in this great country of the US of A, we're supposed to have some freedom, provided we hurt no one. We're supposed to have choice. We're supposed to be able to decide for ourselves what is good for us. We're adults. We don't want other peoples' opinions to reign over our own lives. That's freedom. You chose to not involve yourself in the industry, as I am sure millions would also do. But for those who want to be able to buy some pussy, cock, tits or ass in a legal, clean, safe, and legit way should also have a choice. Besides. I don't want ANYONE (including Senators) in MY bedroom telling me what I can and can not do. If two consenting adults want to exchange money or goods for some sexual favors, who the hell can tell them they can't do that.
Last edited by Sassafrass : Dec 22, 2007 at 07:02 PM.
|
|
Here's an interesting thought on the subject. Prostitution is illegal, but it's legal to be a member of hate spreading groups like the KKK or Westburo Baptists because of Freedom of speech. So... according to our government Prostitution is more evil then the KKK. That's some backwards morality there...
|
Though, honestly, if a prostitution union popped up, that would be interesting to see. |
|
Well I'm glad at least one person was offended by me. I'll try harder. I thought "nyeah nyeah" was a dead give away that I wasn't being all that serious. Oh well.
Religious argument: Is anybody really going to be shocked that most of the major religions find prostitution to be a deplorable act? Moving on... Moral argument: In general I'm against anything I wouldn't want my kids (if I had any) to be a part of. Prostitution, casual sex, gangs, recreational drug use, violence, etc, etc, etc. Yeah, I'm really that boring and close minded. I don't even want to see this stuff advertised or accepted by society in general. So all I do is continue to vote for legislation that suits me. If I'm overruled by the majority I'll learn to deal with it. I'm not going to pack my bags and head overseas in disgust. Nyeah nyeah! I strongly disagree that people should be allowed to do any old thing they want within the confines of their private lives. Drug abuse affects more than just the one person who does it. Sexual indecency has an emotional impact that goes beyond just the two people involved. It may also have a medical impact that can be so widespread it's frightening. The negative impact these things have on society is too much (imho) to justify the desired rights of the individual. And where do you draw the line? No large group of people is ever going to agree on whether or not a 25 year old can legally have a sexual relationship with a 17 year old. Whichever side you are in favor of, there is going to be a split between people who are comfortable and people who aren't with, oh...let's say a kindergarten teacher who paid her way through college by being a prostitute. If prostitution is legal, who's to say that's unacceptable? How do people in Vegas deal with these issues? :\ But like the situation in the U.S. is really gonna change any time soon. Yay for me! |
No one should really give a flying fuck what the religious think of this. They can practice whatever religion they want to in the privacy of their homes or in congregations. Just like people can have sex in their homes and in orgies. Who the hell cares. You don't like it? Don't do it. (But we totally know the religious do it anyways. =p)
You have your own moral compass. That's great. I'm glad you've actually considered what "right" and "wrong" mean, as most people don't usually consider even thinking about it, and just eat up whatever shit is fed to them. At the same time, your moral compass is not everyone else's. I see what you're saying - you'd personally not chose to see this happen. But what interests me most is that you ignore the facts and continue to shake your head saying "I don't like it, so I won't go for it."
I got proper education regarding drugs and addiction in school. Hell, people do a LOT of stupid shit knowing the consequences.
You have absolutely no right to tell me that I can't tie up my CONSENTING husband and shove a dildo up his ass. I don't tell you what to do - why do you think you have the right to tell me what to do? (Not you or I personally, you know what I mean)
See, you keep arguing these points, but you're really making my case FOR me. In the present, illegal system of prostitution, there are PLENTY of underage people working as little workhorses, putting out for the masses. If the industry was regulated, that shit wouldn't happen. As it stands, since the industry is widely illegal and unchecked, they can do pretty much whatever the hell they want.
|
|
I know for a fact you are just trolling this entire thread, and yes, I know I am falling for this sad troll attempt, but it's all good in my book.
THEY AREN'T UPTIGHT PRICKS. Now just hear me out on this one. Let's take your kindergarten teacher for example. What if, back when you were that age, she was the BEST damn teacher you had. Was kind, understanding, and was quite knowledgeable and helped you understand the world better. In your eyes to this day she was a damn good teacher, and a damn good citizen, nothing about her you could fault her for... Three days from now you find out that she was a legal prostitute and used that money to become a teacher. Now you are met with a options. Either you can look at her as that awesome teacher, who had a private life before becoming a teacher and did things her way to become what she wanted to be. Or, you can look at her in utter disgust and brand her as a whore, and a no good scum sucking waste of life. People in Vegas, apparently, mostly choose option one. While religious fanatics, and downright assholes who live in Vegas typically choose el numero dos. I will say that yes, the actions and choices we make in life define us as human beings. But you also have to remember that applies to people you care for and love as well. For example, what if your boyfriend, or girlfriend, back in highschool/college, happend to just be EXACTLY like those people that bullied you, or you happend to bully around. If they aren't today, are you going to hold it against them that they were back then? And that is the kind of mentallity I think Vegas is running. What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas after all. |
|
I thought prostitution is not actually legal within city confines of Vegas. I am pretty sure that's what a cop told me when I was there, but I see no such documentation. Turns out you can't street walk in Vegas - you just go to a brothel and pay a pretty dime for some company.
You all just yell at me all you like for this link to the wiki on Hoes in Nevada, but at least you may get a little educated. I myself did not know brothels are legal in Rhode Island! I think I know where I will be moving in the future! Which means two states actually allow prostitution! Just not in street-walker style in both Nevada AND Rhode Island. This means that you can't walk the streets as a hoe - you actually have to take up a company to work for. Essentially, contractors for a brothel. Which is a really neat concept, if you ask me. Lastly, I notice that a Baptist pastor from Reno leads the Nevada Brothel Owners' Association. Isn't that dandy? <3
Last edited by Sassafrass : Dec 23, 2007 at 02:24 AM.
|