Gamingforce Interactive Forums
28302 5229

Go Back   Gamingforce Interactive Forums > Gamingforce Network > Political Palace
Register FAQ GFWiki Members List Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums.
GFF is a hellhole full of elitists who chat about everything EXCEPT games. We have a team of dedicated moderators who will ban your ass on the slightest provocation, constant member-organized activities that you are not allowed to participate in, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system where you can post entries that will be completely ignored. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Although membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message) we do not recommend that you sign up, because you will get kicked in the nuts repeatedly.


View Poll Results: Worst President of the 20th Century
William McKinley 1 0.92%
Theodore Roosevelt 0 0%
William H. Taft 4 3.67%
Warren G. Harding 9 8.26%
Calvin Coolidge 2 1.83%
Herbert Hoover 10 9.17%
Franklin D. Roosevelt 3 2.75%
Harry S Truman 3 2.75%
Dwight D. Eisenhower 0 0%
John F. Kennedy 0 0%
Lyndon B. Johnson 11 10.09%
Richard Nixon 11 10.09%
Gerald Ford 2 1.83%
Jimmy Carter 13 11.93%
Ronald Reagan 14 12.84%
George H. W. Bush 19 17.43%
Bill Clinton 3 2.75%
Woodrow Wilson 4 3.67%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Worst President of the 20th Century
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
торжествовать победу


Member 18

Level 43.85

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 04:34 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 05:34 AM #1 (permalink) of 79
Worst President of the 20th Century

Who do you think was the worst US President of the 20th Century? Please disclose your reasons for believing so.
Cal
WIRKN FAMLEES


Member 76

Level 24.97

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 05:51 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 09:51 PM #2 (permalink) of 79
Although Wilson seems to be the doctrinal genesis of so much of why people detest the modern US government, surely he achieved things domestically?

Ronald Raygun, though. War on Drugs, Central America, supply-side economics, SDI, deliberate hamstringing of the conservation movement, wanting to test a nuke in the Tasman. Massive faggot. The shitcunt grin never helped either.

' I've got a good definition
of economic conservative:
someone who promises to
spend $1 less than Howard. '

Last edited by Cal : Jan 10, 2008 at 05:53 AM.
торжествовать победу


Member 18

Level 43.85

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 06:21 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 07:21 AM 1 #3 (permalink) of 79
Although Wilson seems to be the doctrinal genesis of so much of why people detest the modern US government, surely he achieved things domestically?
Wilson tends to get a free pass for Women's Suffrage but among the things he accomplished domestically included firing blacks from Federal positions and imposing full segregation in DC. Of course, hardline racists didn't like Wilson because he didn't oppress blacks enough, and Wilson ended up being the classic example of the overt racist with black friends.

He also repressed free speech through the Espionage and Sedition acts in unprecedented ways to help fight a war we shouldn't have been in.

Lots of presidents have had terrible foreign policy, but I don't think anybody can claim to have damaged international relations for eight decades like Wilson did.
Cal
WIRKN FAMLEES


Member 76

Level 24.97

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 06:44 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 10:44 PM #4 (permalink) of 79
Yeah, I recall reading of unprecedented interracial tension during his government. Didn't lynchings shoot right up throughout the '20s to numbers that hadn't been seen for decades?

Wilson and the Espionage/Sedition Acts reminds me of Billy Hughes and conscription, actually. The zealotry of their interest in Europe's war not tempered even by the prospect of career destruction... Or perhaps it wasn't as big a threat in Wilson's situation; I've NFI what the US electoral attitude was to the First WW.

' I've got a good definition
of economic conservative:
someone who promises to
spend $1 less than Howard. '
торжествовать победу


Member 18

Level 43.85

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 07:48 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 08:48 AM #5 (permalink) of 79
Quote:
Yeah, I recall reading of unprecedented interracial tension during his government. Didn't lynchings shoot right up throughout the '20s to numbers that hadn't been seen for decades?
It was also what sparked the tremendous resurgence of the Klan, and while Wilson stated publicly that they were annoying, he didn't do anything to stop them, of course.

Quote:
I've NFI what the US electoral attitude was to the First WW.
Leading up to the war attitudes were divisive, but once Wilson framed it as a religious war for the security of Democracy, legislators who opposed the war were accused of being traitors.
The Lotus Eater


Member 628

Level 29.35

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 08:11 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 07:11 AM #6 (permalink) of 79
Wow all those comments about Wilson sound eerily familiar.

I really can't comment on worst president of the 20th century because I'm not at all that familiar with many of them. I guess I could go with Richard Nixon for the usual reasons.
Mmmm... Knobs.


Member 8785

Level 23.38

Jun 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 09:03 AM #7 (permalink) of 79
I really can't comment on worst president of the 20th century because I'm not at all that familiar with many of them. I guess I could go with Richard Nixon for the usual reasons.
You mean resumed good relations with China, established a peaceful period during the Cold War with detente, pulled us out of Vietnam with reasonable success, established the EPA and OSHA, and successfully enforced school integration in the south?

That bastard.
торжествовать победу


Member 18

Level 43.85

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 09:34 AM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 10:34 AM #8 (permalink) of 79
Well, there was also the whole bombing Cambodia thing and starting The War on Drugs, but I wouldn't really call Nixon the worst president either. Watergate was what really sank him.
The Realest Nigga In The Room


Member 668

Level 19.11

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 12:46 PM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 01:46 PM 1 1 #9 (permalink) of 79
How in the HELL can you say Ronald Reagan is the worst president of the 20th century? The man is easily in the Top 3 (FDR and Eisenhower the only ones I could conceivably put ahead of him).

With that said -- Jimmy Carter has to be the worst president of the 20th.
Malevolently Mercurial


Member 3

Level 47.95

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 01:10 PM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 02:10 PM #10 (permalink) of 79
Originally Posted by Night Phoenix
How in the HELL can you say Ronald Reagan is the worst president of the 20th century?
People inclined toward the left often do. Foreigners of that inclination even more so.

That said, I'm inclining towards Lyndon Johnson in this poll. Vietnam figures prominently, in that Johnson both got us heavily involved in that war, and then managed to lose it by halting the pursuit after Ia Drang, overruling his commanders. This let the Communists get away without suffering further casualties. It also, by allowing them to escape into Cambodia, established that country as a safe haven and set Nixon up for all kinds of hell when he tried to do something about it years later.

He was also responsible for the expansion of federal power over domestic policy that the Great Society brought.
I won't be a goldfish in a bowl


Member 389

Level 42.27

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:21 PM #11 (permalink) of 79
With that said -- Jimmy Carter has to be the worst president of the 20th.
Carter has basically gone completely insane and said terrible things in public while in far-away countries about the country he formerly served. That, right there gentlemen, makes him incredibly worse than anyone else on the list.

Despite all his bullshit, *at least* Nixon went to China.

(I'm not sure about Johnson. I think its a bigger error to not know when to leave a war than it is to get involved. He certainly did some things I don't like, but that can be said about practically every president I know anything about - save Roosevelt.)
This farce... this 20th century Bastille that pretends to be a pocket Democracy... Can you laugh? Can you cry? Can you think? Unlike me, many of you have accepted the situation of your imprisonment, and will die here like rotten cabbages.
Always waiting, never there.


Member 26124

Level 8.73

Nov 2007


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:33 PM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 08:33 PM #12 (permalink) of 79
I can't decide between Bush or Reagan. I voted for Bush; I suppose I'm biased, though, because I have a more vivid impression of the presidents who were in office during my lifetime. Truman is in the race as well, since he eventually made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan.
торжествовать победу


Member 18

Level 43.85

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:37 PM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 03:37 PM #13 (permalink) of 79
I can't decide between Bush or Reagan. I voted for Bush; I suppose I'm biased, though, because I have a more vivid impression of the presidents who were in office during my lifetime.
Yeah no shit. Bush was one of the least eventful Presidencies in history, Gulf War aside.
Malevolently Mercurial


Member 3

Level 47.95

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:38 PM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 03:38 PM #14 (permalink) of 79
Originally Posted by LeHah
I think its a bigger error to not know when to leave a war than it is to get involved.
This is perfectly understandable. My point wasn't that he got us involved, per se, but that he (with no small amount of assistance from Robert McNamara) set us up for failure in Vietnam and all the misery that resulted from it. If you're going to do something as important as fight a war, do it right.

(Yes, this same criticism can and should be leveled against George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld.)

Johnson also made the mistake of appointing Ramsey Clark as Attorney General.

Originally Posted by Traveller87
I can't decide between Bush or Reagan. I voted for Bush; I suppose I'm biased, though, because I have a more vivid impression of the presidents who were in office during my lifetime.
That's pretty shaky reasoning; by that logic, Clinton should be on your list, too.
Carob Nut


Member 751

Level 5.43

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:46 PM #15 (permalink) of 79
I wouldn't really consider McKinley for the 20th century since he wasn't around for long. Regardless, I would probably say the presidents that were around in the 20s, Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover were probably some of the worst presidents of the 20th century. I would put them along along with Carter and probably Johnson as well, though Johnson did pass some good civil rights legislation. Oh, and yes Wilson was a racist, but he was still a progressive that cracked down on trusts and so forth, and he had some good ideas too, like the League of Nations.
торжествовать победу


Member 18

Level 43.85

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:54 PM Local time: Jan 10, 2008, 03:54 PM #16 (permalink) of 79
I wouldn't really consider McKinley for the 20th century since he wasn't around for long.
He was still technically a 20th Century president. Not only that, but the Spanish-American War sparked the beginning of the United States as an imperial, or interventionist global power, which set the tone for T. Roosevelt, Wilson, and the Cold War.
I won't be a goldfish in a bowl


Member 389

Level 42.27

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2008, 02:59 PM 1