Face or Body?

For me face is much more important than body. Imagine you're sleeping with her, look in her face and your little friend is calling out a retreat. I'm sorry for saying it so directly but isn't it true? (And no, you can't do it from behind everytime)

Of course, body should be within predefined proportions but if face is bad, there's no longer a serious chance.


Edit: But we shouldn't forget that the most beautiful woman is nothing if she had a personality like a zombie.

Originally Posted by Hamu-Sumo

(And no, you can't do it from behind everytime)

Yes, you can. Get the fuck out and come back when you know what you're talking about.

Originally Posted by Fresh Frank

Yes, you can. Get the fuck out and come back when you know what you're talking about.

You forgot the irony tags, my friend.

You're saying you can't fuck a girl from behind every time you do the deed.

But you can. So you're wrong.

Face is most important to me. Honestly it seems more times then not, if a girl has a nice face, she also has a nice body. It's not neccessarily true the other way around.

And honestly I'd think people kiss more often then they have sex and if someone is really freaking ugly. I don't know how you'd be able to stand to kiss them.

Originally Posted by DarkMageOzzie

If a girl has a nice face, she also has a nice body. It's not neccessarily true the other way around.

FAILURE

Gee I love how you chopped off part of what I said to misquote me. But, whatever. At least I caused you to post something aside from that annoying face.

Originally Posted by Fresh Frank

You're saying you can't fuck a girl from behind every time you do the deed.

But you can. So you're wrong.

Okay okay, you can do it. That's right. But it's unusual I guess. I mean, for me it would be boring to have sex in the same way eeeeverytime. Furthermore, imagine you're a great lover (beside from the fact you are one in reality or not, so don't get me wrong) and you are sleeping with a girl not for five minutes but, hm, let me say, 20 minutes or more. Would you do it only from behind for 20 minutes? Everytime? I don't believe.

Originally Posted by Hamu-Sumo

Furthermore, imagine you're a great lover and you are sleeping with a girl not for five minutes but, hm, let me say, 20 minutes or more. Would you do it only from behind for 20 minutes? Everytime? I don't believe.

Thank you for my morning laugh.

I will never understand why people continue to post about sex once they've been shown they have no idea what they are talking about.

I dunno...to approach a girl, Like many others have said, you'd have to be attracted to the whole package...and probably for me, from far off its the body. Then it would go to face.

But all in all, after the date, if her personality is that of a pencil...umm...bye?

-------------------------

And I agree with you on that Midna...seriously. If you can't really look at the girls face, you shouldn't be sleeping with her in the first place.

Body, come on. What kind of a question is this anyways. Anyone who's worth two fucking pennies would say body.

Personally the kind of body that I like has 3 legs, a cat's tail, four arms, two and a half eyes and at least five vaginas.

OK, now the internet knows about what I find attractive. Back to LARPing.

er, both? i mean, seriously, even if she's a pretty face, her body doesn't quite turn u on, what the heck man? as for hot body, but u can't bear to even look at her, my gawd, no.

Generally it's alright if you're slightly plump or chubby, or if you aren't that cute a girl, but seriously, meet both minimum requirements please.

but comparatively, i'd say body. There's always a thing called a paper bag.

Well I'd say I'm pretty open but I like a decent face with good teeth of course, and a good or smaller body; but, I am going to have to agree with Webjay and say that qualities are so variant that I can break the statement I said before as long as she has at least a clear face. I've definately liked chubby/fat girls a few times based off of personality and such, which would come first, but I still would say I shoot for face first.

My only prerequisite is that she plays the violin (or cello) as well or better than I play the piano, and that she loves classical music at least as much as I do.

Face and body are a distant second to that….

Originally Posted by yevheniy

My only prerequisite is that she plays the violin (or cello) as well or better than I play the piano, and that she loves classical music at least as much as I do.

Face and body are a distant second to that….

So you're saying you would date the fattest, grossest, most heinous cunt on the face of the planet if she can play one of two specific instruments well?

Uh huh. You know what, Ludwig? You can fuck right off and never come back with this shit. I mean, seriously. Get a grip on yourself. The world doesn't benefit from your idiot romanticism bullshit. No, you wouldn't date a heffer because she can draw a bow across a string. So don't sit here and tell people you would. Or maybe the problem is that you can't pull a hot bird?

Either way, leave.

I remember a guy saying basically the same thing last year. Basically someone who's such a fanboy for his hobby that it becomes a necessity for his partner to regard it as positively is someone who is better off becoming a crazy snake guy.

Maybe it's just me, but it has to be both body and face that are attractive to me. If you have an ugly face and a sexy body, then that person is still unnattractive to me. If a girl has a sexy face and an ugly body, it's still quite unnattractive to me. It has to be both or nothing.

Face first, body second. You can always excercise, burn off the fat and build muscle. Not as easy with a face.