 33052 |
 29379 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | GFWiki | Members List | Donate | Arcade | ChocoJournal | Mark Forums Read |
| Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
  Member 18 Level 45.55 Feb 2006 
|
What's most important right now is scaling back the powers of the Executive before giving them something like the line-item veto. Other than Kucinich and Paul, the only other candidate I can remember who has promised to eliminate the superpowers of the Executive is Obama, but Obama isn't an ideologue, and promises are easily broken.
|
Member 686 Level 14.84 Mar 2006
|
Seems like I'm quite contradictory with my score and candidates. XD
Joe Biden- 35 pts John McCain- 34 pts tied with a 30 for Clinton, Sam, and Brownback. I was surprise how Joe came on top of my list despite me opposing most of his favors.. :/   |
Member 1049 Level 32.84 Mar 2006
|
"Being a negative twat" Not at all "supporting a counter point in the political palace." Cheers for banning me so I couldn't double check Frank's phone number, we had a great time not catching up in North America. Life has been off the hook, thanks for asking!
Last edited by RABicle : Dec 9, 2007 at 02:00 AM.
|
Member 136 Level 34.22 Mar 2006
|
Hilary Clinton and Obama - 44
Chris Dodd - 41 John Edwards - 36 Mike Gravel and Joe Biden - 31 The First Republican is Giuliani at 17. Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson is 3 (hehe) |
|
Razgriz-2
Member 75 Level 49.86 Mar 2006
|
Kucinich - 43
Dodd - 40 Gravel - 37 Obama - 37 lol I basically go through all of the Dems before the Republicans. Agree with them more on social issues and pretty much against privatizing shit. |
Member 11 Level 52.76 Feb 2006
|
Giuliani: 27
McCain: 20 Romney: 17 Paul: 17 Richardson: 15 Edwards: 15 Kucinich: 15 Clinton: 13 Gilmore: 13 Obama: 13 Hunter: 12 Thompson: 12 Huckabee: 11 Dodd: 10 Biden: 10 Gavel: 7 Tancredo: 6 Brownback: 6 Huh, I never figured Giuliani. My numbers seem fairly close together. I didn't really care about all the issues and some of them didn't really address my concerns. Like that biofuel/ethanol question. I don't think the government should be involved in that at all since I believe competition will drive that to the right place. That and think ethanol is a huge waste of corn. We should just have fucking fuel cells or some shit that doesn't require ridiculous factories and just as much pollution to produce. Plus the whole abortion thing is iffy with me. I think that in a life/death situation, rape, etc. the choice should be there if necessary. There are other reasons like the idea that women have this obligation as baby factories that I don't really agree with. I don't like abortion but I sure as hell am not going to force anyone to have a baby that doesn't want to have one. So I'm not pro-abortion I'm just against limiting people of the liberty of their own bodies.  |
Member 17840 Level 7.95 Jan 2007
|
The link in Brady's post seems to be broken, here's a non-broken link.
Oddly enough, Hillary and Obama wound up tied at the top of my list (40 points), though, personally, Hillary kind of bothers me and I don't have a ton of faith in Obama's leadership abilities. I like how everyone except Ron Paul supports those stupid ethanol subsidies when ethanol fuel is, at best, weakly energy-positive and jacks up food prices. Richardson, Edwards, and Kucinich were all tied at 38 points. Odd, since I reckon I agree with Kucinich more than any of the other candidates, and I would probably vote for Richardson if I somehow wound up voting in a primary. Incidentally, I went through every single Democrat before hitting a single Republican. (Giuliani, at 28 points) hey, somehow, my hometown's news channel wound up on the Internets.  [ Karl-Heinz Sammer ] |
Member 690 Level 8.40 Mar 2006
|
Tom Tancredo - 32
John McCain - 31 Rudy Giuliani - 31 Mitt Romney - 28 Joe Biden - 26 Fred Thompson - 25 Duncan Hunter - 25 Ron Paul - 21 Bill Richardson - 21 Mike Huckabee - 20 Barack Obama - 16 John Edwards - 16 Hillary Clinton - 16 Chris Dodd - 11 Mike Gravel - 11 Dennis Kucinich - 11 About what I expected. |
Member 25457 Level 3.20 Oct 2007
|
Tied between Giuliani and McCain at 41 apiece. However since no one really knows what McCain stands for exactly, let alone himself, I don't suppose he counts in this particular case.
The Democrat I agree with the most is Joe Biden at 31. The candidate I agreed with the least with is a three way tie between Kucinich, Mike Gravel, and Chris Dodd with a score of 13.
The alleged purpose of antitrust laws was to protect competition; that purpose was based on the socialistic fallacy that a free, unregulated market will inevitably lead to the establishment of coercive monopolies. But, in fact, no coercive monopoly has ever been or ever can be established by means of free trade on a free market. Every coercive monopoly was created by government intervention into the economy, by special privileges which closed the entry of competitors in a given field, by legislative action. ~Ayn Rand
|
Member 27199 Level 4.12 Dec 2007
|
I took the quiz and got a three-way tie with Kucinich, Dodd, and Edwards, with Obama and Hillary being close 2nds. So I'm guessing it's pretty accurate, since I've been planning on voting for either Obama or Edwards in the primaries anyway.
Interestingly enough though I've always considered myself to be a moderate yet I matched up with every single democrat candidate more than any one of the republican candidates.
Last edited by AtomicDuck : Dec 19, 2007 at 11:49 PM.
|
