Gamingforce Interactive Forums
35968 29861

Go Back   Gamingforce Interactive Forums > Gamingforce Entertainment > Video Gaming
Register FAQ GFWiki Members List Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Gamingforce Interactive Forums.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


[General Discussion] Single games are now a "series?"
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Hard to believe it was just 5 seasons...


Member 1399

Level 24.80

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 04:46 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 02:46 PM #1 (permalink) of 21
[General Discussion] Single games are now a "series?"

Why are single games referred to as a "series?"

1 game + a bunch of hype about an upcoming sequel/spin-off = 1 game
2 games = 1 game + 1 sequel
3 games = a trilogy
4 or more games = a series

I'm sorry, but I often hear gamers throw this word about to describe a single title, and it gets really old. I feel that it does injustice to true long-running actual series such as Ultima, Wizardry, Might and Magic, etc. that are true intellectual property franchises that have been going for decades. A single game is now a "series?" Give me a break...
TREAT?!?


Member 12

Level 35.63

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 04:49 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 02:49 PM #2 (permalink) of 21
Uh, what on Earth are you talking about? How about an example?
and Brandy does her best to understand
Let's go, Voltron Force!


Member 201

Level 37.12

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 05:00 PM #3 (permalink) of 21
Eh? I've NEVER heard anyone calling one game a 'series.' I'd like to see some examples of what the heck you're talking about, please.


DN Theme postponed until I download the rest of the eps.
My Backloggery

Chocobo


Member 510

Level 11.38

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 05:06 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 02:06 PM #4 (permalink) of 21
Originally Posted by speculative
Why are single games referred to as a "series?"

1 game + a bunch of hype about an upcoming sequel/spin-off = 1 game
2 games = 1 game + 1 sequel
3 games = a trilogy
4 or more games = a series

I'm sorry, but I often hear gamers throw this word about to describe a single title, and it gets really old. I feel that it does injustice to true long-running actual series such as Ultima, Wizardry, Might and Magic, etc. that are true intellectual property franchises that have been going for decades. A single game is now a "series?" Give me a break...
I can't really think of any single game titles that are refered to as series. If there are any, they are probably games that are confirmed(or extremely likely) to have sequels. BTW, a series doesn't mean 4 or more, 2 games would be considered a series.

Last edited by Enter User Name : Mar 17, 2006 at 05:09 PM.
24-bit/48kHz


Member 23132

Level 28.41

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 05:33 PM #5 (permalink) of 21
Series is just another way of saying franchise.
huh?


Member 222

Level 34.70

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 05:36 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 04:36 PM #6 (permalink) of 21
I can't think of any single game that is often referred to as a series. I mean really, an example or four would be nice, otherwise I'm just going to dismiss you as a crazy person.
Did someone call my name?
Take about five dozen eggs...


Member 570

Level 40.05

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 06:10 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 05:10 PM #7 (permalink) of 21
Originally Posted by Megalith
Series is just another way of saying franchise.
I think that still brings the question to mind:

How can you call a single game a [franchise]?

Links (Updated 6/21)
...start puttin' 'em in a bowl...
Knock knock who's there? Me! I keel you!


Member 858

Level 27.52

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 06:16 PM #8 (permalink) of 21
..which still bring that request: can you list some of the single games called as series/franchise ?
Hard to believe it was just 5 seasons...


Member 1399

Level 24.80

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 06:23 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 04:23 PM #9 (permalink) of 21
Sorry, since the forums have wiped (are these present ones even being backed up???) I don't have any examples at hand. I guess that makes me crazy? Yeah, crazy like a

It's not like it's a big issue anyway; just bored & curious on a Friday and wondering if anyone else had run across this on web forums...

Last edited by speculative : Mar 17, 2006 at 06:27 PM.
Distant Memories


Member 2209

Level 27.29

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 06:30 PM #10 (permalink) of 21
This is one big ingenius trick question if I ever seen one. There is no one game to ever be labeled a 'series'. By your logic, Grandia is barely a series, but does anyone count Grandia Xtreme as part of it?;p

Either way nope can't say I've heard this.
BZ
How much memory does that tape have?


Member 65

Level 27.82

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 06:37 PM #11 (permalink) of 21
People just refer to a series or franchise when they have certain plans to make more games of the same name in the future.

(Kavanaugh hands out a piece of gum) Aceveda: No thank you. Kavanaugh: Nah come on this is a fresh pack, it's Juicy Fruit. (Aceveda stares at him for three seconds...)Aceveda: I said no...thank you. (holds it out still) Kavanaugh: hold this out long enough some people feel compelled to take the gum, it's a sign they'll crack under pressure. Aceveda: (with a smug look) I know. - The Shield

Jon Kavanaugh: "He's just PISSING all over this department, and we're just supposed to lick it up! Do you like the way that tastes? (Lifts his hand up to his mouth) Because it tastes like.....PISS to me!" - The Shield

I guess it's healthy, I guess the air is clean…


Member 10

Level 39.23

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 06:41 PM Local time: Mar 18, 2006, 01:41 AM #12 (permalink) of 21
I've noticed this as well (Halo comes to mind; there have been a few other cases that I can't recall on the top of my head). It's no surprise, given the low level of game-journalism in general; like, how everyone feels the need to use ten cliches per article (did you know that pretty much every game is a ''mixed bag'' over at IGN?). Series, sequel, same thing.

Double Post:
Originally Posted by Bahamut Zero
People just refer to a series or franchise when they have certain plans to make more games of the same name in the future.
So it's acceptable to refer to a book as ''trilogy'' if the author possibly plans on writing two sequels sometime in the future?
Cyborg seadog, tell me what you dream of

Last edited by Aardark : Mar 17, 2006 at 06:48 PM. Reason: Automerged double post.
ambitious


Member 22

Level 30.83

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 07:00 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 05:00 PM #13 (permalink) of 21
I usually see people use the term "series" when talking about at least 3 or more games. I've also seen it used for a game and its sequel, but never for a single game.
TREAT?!?


Member 12

Level 35.63

Feb 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 08:32 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 06:32 PM #14 (permalink) of 21
It certainly makes sense to use it for only two games:

Quote:
series
Pronunciation Key (sîrz)
n. pl. series

1. A number of objects or events arranged or coming one after the other in succession.
I wouldn't use it for less than 3, but it wouldn't exactly bother me or make me think of it as an affront to Ultima.
and Brandy does her best to understand
Everything new is old again


Member 613

Level 29.52

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 09:38 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 07:38 PM #15 (permalink) of 21
Look at StarCraft, any game that has staying power will be considerd a franchise. I just hope we can legitimately call it a series soon.
Of course some RPGs are so damn long, they might as well be a series in itself (Dark Cloud 2 comes to mind, so much to do). I think we can safely say though, that games like Tresspasser or Extreme Paintbrawl are not a series, simply because no one would buy enough copies to allow that to happen.
When Smokers try to lasso him, he grabs their tongues and pulls them to HIM instead.

When Hunters jump on him he flips them over, pins them to the ground, and rips out their teeth one at a time.

When Boomers vomit on him he wipes himself off, shoots peptobismol into their mouths, and performs liposuction on them before splattering their brains on the wall.

When a Tank throws a chunk of concrete at him he rolls up his sleeves and puts on boxing gloves.

When a Witch gives him lip he pulls his hand back and slaps that bitch right in the mouth.

No zombie is safe from Chicago Ted.
Wonderful Chocobo


Member 559

Level 20.83

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2006, 09:45 PM Local time: Mar 17, 2006, 08:45 PM #16 (permalink) of 21
I can't think of any cases where an individual game has been refered to as a series. They've sometimes used the phrase to describe a new series of games that are planned, for example Too Human or Xenosaga (before the first one was released), but I've never heard anyone apply the term to a SINGLE game.

Originally Posted by Aardark
So it's acceptable to refer to a book as ''trilogy'' if the author possibly plans on writing two sequels sometime in the future?
No, the first one would be called "the first book in a trilogy" or "the first in an upcoming series of books". If they just say trilogy or series, then they aren't refering to the first book, they're refering to all the books in the series as a whole.

Last edited by Solis : Mar 17, 2006 at 09:49 PM.
Logic Implosion


Member 1892

Level 7.28

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2006, 09:08 PM #17 (permalink) of 21
Really, I can't say I've ever heard people use the word "series" besides generally in a collection of at least two related objects. Where the related objects in this case would be the original, the sequel, its sequel, and so forth. We might refer to future objects as series, such as "first in an upcoming series" as Solis noted, but other than that I can't recall anyone using series for a singular thing. If they are called "series", the writers are more than likely using the word incorrectly.
Wonderful Chocobo


Member 940

Level 19.45

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2006, 09:14 PM Local time: Mar 20, 2006, 06:14 PM #18 (permalink) of 21
The only time I can even recall a single game being called a series was when they announced CoD2 and activision also announced that they will be continuing the CoD franchise beyond just CoD2 and the Big Red One. But I thought that was somewhat justified since we're probably going to be seeing a few more CoDs.
TEHLINK


Member 1049

Level 32.86

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2006, 10:54 PM Local time: Mar 21, 2006, 12:54 PM #19 (permalink) of 21
Not to mention that the console CoD games were different to the PC one. And there was an expansion pack.
Gentleman Shmupper


Member 848

Level 30.62

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2006, 10:35 AM Local time: Mar 21, 2006, 09:35 AM #20 (permalink) of 21
Starcraft could be called a franchise, but only because it has an expansion and various spinoff products (not counting the vaporware Ghost). I've never known of any games that are essentially standalone to be a franchise or a series, though. When companies smell money, they usually try to milk the cow for a sequel.